First: Profitability and earnings maturity. Many of today's market leaders, such as the key drivers of technological innovation – the so-called Magnificent 7 (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla) – generate substantial profits and demonstrate clear earnings growth. This distinguishes them from the numerous dot-com companies that went public at the time without meaningful profits. While this does not eliminate the hype, it does reduce the risk that developments are purely irrational.
Second: Valuation metrics in historical comparison. Looking at typical valuation metrics such as price-to-earnings ratios (P/E ratios), leading technology firms during the peak of the dot-com bubble (e.g., Microsoft, Cisco, Lucent, Nortel, AOL) had very high forward P/Es of over 80. By comparison, the average P/E ratios of today’s dominant companies are significantly lower (around 25–35x, depending on the data source and timing). This suggests that the current market situation is not entirely analogous to that of the year 2000.
Most portfolios are overweight AI – but don't know it
Nevertheless, investors should not underestimate the risks of the AI boom. In 2000, investment cutbacks, overcapacity, and disappointing profits led to a loss of confidence in the "New Economy." In the case of AI stocks, there is also a short-term risk of overinvestment and misallocation. Political and economic uncertainties add to these risks. Therefore, broad diversification remains crucial to cushion potential setbacks.
However, it is evident that even seemingly well-diversified portfolios are now unintentionally highly exposed to AI. The rapid price increases of major technology and chip companies have led to many indices—and consequently passive investment vehicles – having concentrated allocations in this segment. For investors, this can present a cluster risk that undermines the diversification of their portfolios.